<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update May 27: Samsung Behold II not Getting 2.x &#8211; Legal Action Being Considered</title>
	<atom:link href="http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html</link>
	<description>Your Android News Source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 04:06:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cine.li &#8211; all about Linux and Mac - Android Orphans: Visualizing a Sad History of Support</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-24092</link>
		<dc:creator>cine.li &#8211; all about Linux and Mac - Android Orphans: Visualizing a Sad History of Support</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 21:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-24092</guid>
		<description>[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Android Orphans: Visualizing a Sad History of Support [Android] &#124; My Blog</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-23500</link>
		<dc:creator>Android Orphans: Visualizing a Sad History of Support [Android] &#124; My Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 07:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-23500</guid>
		<description>[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind &#8211; and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind &#8211; and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Android Orphans: Visualizing a Sad History of Support [Android] &#124; Android News Center</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-23497</link>
		<dc:creator>Android Orphans: Visualizing a Sad History of Support [Android] &#124; Android News Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 01:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-23497</guid>
		<description>[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind &#8211; and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind &#8211; and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Android Orphans: Visualising A Sad History Of Support &#124; My Blog</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-23496</link>
		<dc:creator>Android Orphans: Visualising A Sad History Of Support &#124; My Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 01:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-23496</guid>
		<description>[...] Eclair at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eclair at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Android Orphans: Visualizing a Sad History of Support [Android] &#124; Andriod</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-23495</link>
		<dc:creator>Android Orphans: Visualizing a Sad History of Support [Android] &#124; Andriod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 01:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-23495</guid>
		<description>[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind &#8211; and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind &#8211; and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ANDROID ORPHANS: VISUALIZING A SAD HISTORY OF SUPPORT – BUSINESS INSIDER » ANDROID, IPHONE, GOOGLE, THIS, NEXUS, SAMSUNG » TECHNOLOGY NEWSPAPER</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-23492</link>
		<dc:creator>ANDROID ORPHANS: VISUALIZING A SAD HISTORY OF SUPPORT – BUSINESS INSIDER » ANDROID, IPHONE, GOOGLE, THIS, NEXUS, SAMSUNG » TECHNOLOGY NEWSPAPER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-23492</guid>
		<description>[...] Eclair at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eclair at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s brutal being an Android user &#124; My Blog</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-23490</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s brutal being an Android user &#124; My Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-23490</guid>
		<description>[...] Eclair at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eclair at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Android Orphans: Visualizing a Sad History of Support</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-23487</link>
		<dc:creator>Android Orphans: Visualizing a Sad History of Support</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-23487</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ICS Giving Nexus One the Cold Shoulder &#124; Hardin Design &#38; Development Blog</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-23485</link>
		<dc:creator>ICS Giving Nexus One the Cold Shoulder &#124; Hardin Design &#38; Development Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-23485</guid>
		<description>[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: See how Android is fragmented, which hurts consumers and developers</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-23478</link>
		<dc:creator>See how Android is fragmented, which hurts consumers and developers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-23478</guid>
		<description>[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Visualizing A Sad History Of Support &#124; Athens Report</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-23477</link>
		<dc:creator>Visualizing A Sad History Of Support &#124; Athens Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-23477</guid>
		<description>[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind &#8212; and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind &mdash; and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Android Orphans: Visualizing A Sad History Of Support &#124; Android</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-23475</link>
		<dc:creator>Android Orphans: Visualizing A Sad History Of Support &#124; Android</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-23475</guid>
		<description>[...] Eclair at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eclair at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung sells 10m Galaxy S phones, its major market still on Android 2.1 &#124; Prjct Mobile</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-22346</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung sells 10m Galaxy S phones, its major market still on Android 2.1 &#124; Prjct Mobile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 14:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-22346</guid>
		<description>[...] with the Nexus One in January of 2010. Samsung&#8217;s history with upgrading has always been shaky but it has been shaky with sub-par devices. The Galaxy S was Samsung&#8217;s first major play in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with the Nexus One in January of 2010. Samsung&#8217;s history with upgrading has always been shaky but it has been shaky with sub-par devices. The Galaxy S was Samsung&#8217;s first major play in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Behold 2 victim!!</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-15021</link>
		<dc:creator>Behold 2 victim!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-15021</guid>
		<description>how did you do this .....there still trying to sale this phone to other people and its still priced 300!!+ dollars!!!!!!!!....WTF...can you help with this ..? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how did you do this &#8230;..there still trying to sale this phone to other people and its still priced 300!!+ dollars!!!!!!!!&#8230;.WTF&#8230;can you help with this ..?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung, T-Mobile Class Action Suit Looming Over Vibrant Froyo Debacle &#124; Androidheadlines.com</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-12746</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung, T-Mobile Class Action Suit Looming Over Vibrant Froyo Debacle &#124; Androidheadlines.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 23:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-12746</guid>
		<description>[...] The Samsung Galaxy S line of phones has been upgraded to Android 2.2 in most other countries, and we have wondered why there is still a delay in the United States.  Galaxy S phones began to be released in June, 2010, and a Froyo update was promised during the launch event.  None of the Galaxy S line sold by the four major US carriers have been updated, and while they have been promised, no firm dates have been given.  Equivalent phones sold in Canada, however, have had their updates announced.  And it&#8217;s not like Samsung doesn&#8217;t already have a reputation for this sort of thing; remember the Behold II? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Samsung Galaxy S line of phones has been upgraded to Android 2.2 in most other countries, and we have wondered why there is still a delay in the United States.  Galaxy S phones began to be released in June, 2010, and a Froyo update was promised during the launch event.  None of the Galaxy S line sold by the four major US carriers have been updated, and while they have been promised, no firm dates have been given.  Equivalent phones sold in Canada, however, have had their updates announced.  And it&#8217;s not like Samsung doesn&#8217;t already have a reputation for this sort of thing; remember the Behold II? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urgens</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-12743</link>
		<dc:creator>Urgens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 07:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-12743</guid>
		<description>anybody know how to join a lawsuit against samsung for the behold 2? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anybody know how to join a lawsuit against samsung for the behold 2?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung Behold II fails to fulfill Android 2.0 promise, jilted users contemplating lawsuit (video) &#124; Dschool</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-11653</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung Behold II fails to fulfill Android 2.0 promise, jilted users contemplating lawsuit (video) &#124; Dschool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 00:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-11653</guid>
		<description>[...] &#160;&#124;&#160; Android Headlines &#160;&#124;&#160;Email [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &nbsp;|&nbsp; Android Headlines &nbsp;|&nbsp;Email [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung Behold II won’t get Android 2.x update, users planning to sue &#171; Korea.com &#124; Gateway to Cyber Korea</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-9144</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung Behold II won’t get Android 2.x update, users planning to sue &#171; Korea.com &#124; Gateway to Cyber Korea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 06:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-9144</guid>
		<description>[...] Source 1, 2&#124;Via [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source 1, 2|Via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonesthetruth</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-7488</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonesthetruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-7488</guid>
		<description>look if everybody calmz down and doez sum research....u would notice that the G1 can get a 2.x update.....so how cum the BH2 cant? when itz way more up to date than da very 1st andriod phone.....it dont make sense</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>look if everybody calmz down and doez sum research&#8230;.u would notice that the G1 can get a 2.x update&#8230;..so how cum the BH2 cant? when itz way more up to date than da very 1st andriod phone&#8230;..it dont make sense</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lousua76</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-8621</link>
		<dc:creator>Lousua76</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 06:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-8621</guid>
		<description>Could you share some more info about it? I talked to a whole lot of people and I got nowhere with anyone. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you share some more info about it? I talked to a whole lot of people and I got nowhere with anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ol_man_ed</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-7204</link>
		<dc:creator>Ol_man_ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 04:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-7204</guid>
		<description>Dont know if anyone else has been trying to talk with tmobile or not, but last week they finally called me back after i had emailed their executive department, and gave me the choice of a replacement phone. I went with the vibrant, but anything out there that tmobile has you are allowed to choose from...

new phone should be here tomorrow...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont know if anyone else has been trying to talk with tmobile or not, but last week they finally called me back after i had emailed their executive department, and gave me the choice of a replacement phone. I went with the vibrant, but anything out there that tmobile has you are allowed to choose from&#8230;</p>
<p>new phone should be here tomorrow&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Guthrie</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-6420</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Guthrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-6420</guid>
		<description>I wrote this about two months ago... &lt;a href=&quot;http://thealteredrealm.tumblr.com/post/681277722/this-just-in-samsucks&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://thealteredrealm.tumblr.com/post/681277722/...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
Turns out I might&#039;ve been right </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote this about two months ago&#8230; <a href="http://thealteredrealm.tumblr.com/post/681277722/this-just-in-samsucks" rel="nofollow">http://thealteredrealm.tumblr.com/post/681277722/&#8230;</a> </p>
<p>Turns out I might&#039;ve been right</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryce Reeves</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-7964</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce Reeves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 07:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-7964</guid>
		<description>And even that&#039;s not stock</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And even that&#8217;s not stock</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is anyone going to get rid of the Evo for the Epic4g? - Page 8 - Android Central Forums</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-5498</link>
		<dc:creator>Is anyone going to get rid of the Evo for the Epic4g? - Page 8 - Android Central Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 04:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-5498</guid>
		<description>[...] Update May 27: Samsung Behold II not Getting 2.x &#8211; Legal Action Being Considered &#124; Androidhead...  Lol dont worry its coming lol... Just going to take a little time and they make nowhere near as many devices as HTC.. Their support should be better given the amount of phones they release but its not... That is all...       Last edited by youngzayiles; 08-02-2010 at 06:26 PM. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update May 27: Samsung Behold II not Getting 2.x &#8211; Legal Action Being Considered | Androidhead&#8230;  Lol dont worry its coming lol&#8230; Just going to take a little time and they make nowhere near as many devices as HTC.. Their support should be better given the amount of phones they release but its not&#8230; That is all&#8230;       Last edited by youngzayiles; 08-02-2010 at 06:26 PM. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is anyone going to get rid of the Evo for the Epic4g? - Page 8 - Android Central Forums</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-5394</link>
		<dc:creator>Is anyone going to get rid of the Evo for the Epic4g? - Page 8 - Android Central Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 22:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-5394</guid>
		<description>[...] Update May 27: Samsung Behold II not Getting 2.x &#8211; Legal Action Being Considered &#124; Androidhead...  Lol dont worry its coming... Just going to take a little time and they make nowhere near as many devices as HTC.. Their support should be better given the amount of phones they release but its not... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update May 27: Samsung Behold II not Getting 2.x &#8211; Legal Action Being Considered | Androidhead&#8230;  Lol dont worry its coming&#8230; Just going to take a little time and they make nowhere near as many devices as HTC.. Their support should be better given the amount of phones they release but its not&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung Betrug</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-2988</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung Betrug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 09:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-2988</guid>
		<description>[...] Suit for 2.0) Am 27 Mai is t die Blase geplatzt und Samsung sagt jetzt es wird nie 2.0 geben (Update May 27: Samsung Behold II not Getting 2.x &#8211; Legal Action Being Considered &#124; Androidhead...). Ich meine dass ist  &#066;&#101;&#116;&#114;&#117;&#103; - Samsung regiert gar nicht auf email [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Suit for 2.0) Am 27 Mai is t die Blase geplatzt und Samsung sagt jetzt es wird nie 2.0 geben (Update May 27: Samsung Behold II not Getting 2.x &#8211; Legal Action Being Considered | Androidhead&#8230;). Ich meine dass ist  &#66;&#101;&#116;&#114;&#117;&#103; &#8211; Samsung regiert gar nicht auf email [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Things iPhone Does Better Than Android - TiPb iPhone, iPad, iPod Forums</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-2092</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Things iPhone Does Better Than Android - TiPb iPhone, iPad, iPod Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 19:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-2092</guid>
		<description>[...] the hardware, and even when they do promise an update, sometimes they decide not to deliver (see Samsung and the Behold II). There is no guarantee your phone will ever get an official update.   Some people will say the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the hardware, and even when they do promise an update, sometimes they decide not to deliver (see Samsung and the Behold II). There is no guarantee your phone will ever get an official update.   Some people will say the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google to update Android OS once a year &#124; Tech Alps</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-1941</link>
		<dc:creator>Google to update Android OS once a year &#124; Tech Alps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 01:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-1941</guid>
		<description>[...] products instead of you waiting and wondering if your device will ever receive one, hence the Samsung Behold II debacle. It will make life a lot easier for development of newer applications.  With one year before the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] products instead of you waiting and wondering if your device will ever receive one, hence the Samsung Behold II debacle. It will make life a lot easier for development of newer applications.  With one year before the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung Not Responding to Users Questions? &#124; Quick Tech News</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-1924</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung Not Responding to Users Questions? &#124; Quick Tech News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-1924</guid>
		<description>[...]  Samsung Not Responding to Users Questions?June 1st, 2010 by qicktechnews.comIn a story published a couple of weeks ago we saw Samsung back away from their word on an update for the Behold II to Android 2.x. There has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Samsung Not Responding to Users Questions?June 1st, 2010 by qicktechnews.comIn a story published a couple of weeks ago we saw Samsung back away from their word on an update for the Behold II to Android 2.x. There has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung Behold II won’t get Android 2.x update, users planning to sue &#171; [TEST] Korea.com</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-1920</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung Behold II won’t get Android 2.x update, users planning to sue &#171; [TEST] Korea.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-1920</guid>
		<description>[...] Source 1, 2&#124;Via [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source 1, 2|Via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung Behold II won’t get Android 2.x update, users planning to sue &#171; Korea.com &#62; Tech</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-1903</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung Behold II won’t get Android 2.x update, users planning to sue &#171; Korea.com &#62; Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 23:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-1903</guid>
		<description>[...] Source 1, 2&#124;Via [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source 1, 2|Via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Upcoming stuff, the blog lives on(video) &#124; The Anphase Blog</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-1865</link>
		<dc:creator>Upcoming stuff, the blog lives on(video) &#124; The Anphase Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 08:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-1865</guid>
		<description>[...] pan out as usual. The disgruntled Behold II owners started a petition and they are even threatening legal action. That sounds awfully familiar. Maybe they&#8217;ll write a report next, who [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pan out as usual. The disgruntled Behold II owners started a petition and they are even threatening legal action. That sounds awfully familiar. Maybe they&#8217;ll write a report next, who [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-8584</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 07:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-8584</guid>
		<description>Google stated that Froyo was built with slower processors in mind. Maybe the folks at this post can help some of you Behold users get 2.2 on your phones. 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://phandroid.com/2010/05/21/froyo-technically-possible-on-the-g1-still-not-likely-to-receive-official-update/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://phandroid.com/2010/05/21/froyo-technically...&lt;/a&gt;  
 
Good luck. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google stated that Froyo was built with slower processors in mind. Maybe the folks at this post can help some of you Behold users get 2.2 on your phones.</p>
<p>  <a href="http://phandroid.com/2010/05/21/froyo-technically-possible-on-the-g1-still-not-likely-to-receive-official-update/" rel="nofollow">http://phandroid.com/2010/05/21/froyo-technically&#8230;</a>  </p>
<p>Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-1864</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 03:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-1864</guid>
		<description>Google stated that Froyo was built with slower processors in mind. Maybe the folks at this post can help some of you Behold users get 2.2 on your phones. 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://phandroid.com/2010/05/21/froyo-technically-possible-on-the-g1-still-not-likely-to-receive-official-update/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://phandroid.com/2010/05/21/froyo-technically...&lt;/a&gt;  
 
Good luck. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google stated that Froyo was built with slower processors in mind. Maybe the folks at this post can help some of you Behold users get 2.2 on your phones.</p>
<p>  <a href="http://phandroid.com/2010/05/21/froyo-technically-possible-on-the-g1-still-not-likely-to-receive-official-update/" rel="nofollow">http://phandroid.com/2010/05/21/froyo-technically&#8230;</a>  </p>
<p>Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Behold 2 is a waste of time. - Page 2 - Android Forums</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-1856</link>
		<dc:creator>Behold 2 is a waste of time. - Page 2 - Android Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 01:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-1856</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

