<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update May 27: Samsung Behold II not Getting 2.x &#8211; Legal Action Being Considered</title>
	<atom:link href="http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 21:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cine.li &#8211; all about Linux and Mac - Android Orphans: Visualizing a Sad History of Support</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-24092</link>
		<dc:creator>cine.li &#8211; all about Linux and Mac - Android Orphans: Visualizing a Sad History of Support</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 21:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-24092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Android Orphans: Visualizing a Sad History of Support [Android] &#124; My Blog</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-23500</link>
		<dc:creator>Android Orphans: Visualizing a Sad History of Support [Android] &#124; My Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 07:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-23500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind &#8211; and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind &#8211; and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Android Orphans: Visualizing a Sad History of Support [Android] &#124; Android News Center</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-23497</link>
		<dc:creator>Android Orphans: Visualizing a Sad History of Support [Android] &#124; Android News Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 01:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-23497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind &#8211; and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind &#8211; and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Android Orphans: Visualising A Sad History Of Support &#124; My Blog</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-23496</link>
		<dc:creator>Android Orphans: Visualising A Sad History Of Support &#124; My Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 01:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-23496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Eclair at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eclair at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Android Orphans: Visualizing a Sad History of Support [Android] &#124; Andriod</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-23495</link>
		<dc:creator>Android Orphans: Visualizing a Sad History of Support [Android] &#124; Andriod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 01:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-23495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind &#8211; and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind &#8211; and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ANDROID ORPHANS: VISUALIZING A SAD HISTORY OF SUPPORT – BUSINESS INSIDER » ANDROID, IPHONE, GOOGLE, THIS, NEXUS, SAMSUNG » TECHNOLOGY NEWSPAPER</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-23492</link>
		<dc:creator>ANDROID ORPHANS: VISUALIZING A SAD HISTORY OF SUPPORT – BUSINESS INSIDER » ANDROID, IPHONE, GOOGLE, THIS, NEXUS, SAMSUNG » TECHNOLOGY NEWSPAPER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-23492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Eclair at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eclair at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s brutal being an Android user &#124; My Blog</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-23490</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s brutal being an Android user &#124; My Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-23490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Eclair at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eclair at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Android Orphans: Visualizing a Sad History of Support</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-23487</link>
		<dc:creator>Android Orphans: Visualizing a Sad History of Support</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-23487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ICS Giving Nexus One the Cold Shoulder &#124; Hardin Design &#38; Development Blog</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-23485</link>
		<dc:creator>ICS Giving Nexus One the Cold Shoulder &#124; Hardin Design &#38; Development Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-23485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: See how Android is fragmented, which hurts consumers and developers</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-23478</link>
		<dc:creator>See how Android is fragmented, which hurts consumers and developers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-23478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Visualizing A Sad History Of Support &#124; Athens Report</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-23477</link>
		<dc:creator>Visualizing A Sad History Of Support &#124; Athens Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-23477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind &#8212; and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind &mdash; and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Android Orphans: Visualizing A Sad History Of Support &#124; Android</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-23475</link>
		<dc:creator>Android Orphans: Visualizing A Sad History Of Support &#124; Android</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-23475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Eclair at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eclair at least. But at launch the phone was already two major versions behind — and then Samsung decided not to do the update after all, and it fell three major OS versions behind. Every one ever sold is still under contract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung sells 10m Galaxy S phones, its major market still on Android 2.1 &#124; Prjct Mobile</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-22346</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung sells 10m Galaxy S phones, its major market still on Android 2.1 &#124; Prjct Mobile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 14:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-22346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] with the Nexus One in January of 2010. Samsung&#8217;s history with upgrading has always been shaky but it has been shaky with sub-par devices. The Galaxy S was Samsung&#8217;s first major play in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with the Nexus One in January of 2010. Samsung&#8217;s history with upgrading has always been shaky but it has been shaky with sub-par devices. The Galaxy S was Samsung&#8217;s first major play in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung, T-Mobile Class Action Suit Looming Over Vibrant Froyo Debacle &#124; Androidheadlines.com</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-12746</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung, T-Mobile Class Action Suit Looming Over Vibrant Froyo Debacle &#124; Androidheadlines.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 23:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-12746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Samsung Galaxy S line of phones has been upgraded to Android 2.2 in most other countries, and we have wondered why there is still a delay in the United States.  Galaxy S phones began to be released in June, 2010, and a Froyo update was promised during the launch event.  None of the Galaxy S line sold by the four major US carriers have been updated, and while they have been promised, no firm dates have been given.  Equivalent phones sold in Canada, however, have had their updates announced.  And it&#8217;s not like Samsung doesn&#8217;t already have a reputation for this sort of thing; remember the Behold II? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Samsung Galaxy S line of phones has been upgraded to Android 2.2 in most other countries, and we have wondered why there is still a delay in the United States.  Galaxy S phones began to be released in June, 2010, and a Froyo update was promised during the launch event.  None of the Galaxy S line sold by the four major US carriers have been updated, and while they have been promised, no firm dates have been given.  Equivalent phones sold in Canada, however, have had their updates announced.  And it&#8217;s not like Samsung doesn&#8217;t already have a reputation for this sort of thing; remember the Behold II? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung Behold II fails to fulfill Android 2.0 promise, jilted users contemplating lawsuit (video) &#124; Dschool</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-11653</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung Behold II fails to fulfill Android 2.0 promise, jilted users contemplating lawsuit (video) &#124; Dschool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 00:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-11653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#160;&#124;&#160; Android Headlines &#160;&#124;&#160;Email [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &nbsp;|&nbsp; Android Headlines &nbsp;|&nbsp;Email [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung Behold II won’t get Android 2.x update, users planning to sue &#171; Korea.com &#124; Gateway to Cyber Korea</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-9144</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung Behold II won’t get Android 2.x update, users planning to sue &#171; Korea.com &#124; Gateway to Cyber Korea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 06:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-9144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Source 1, 2&#124;Via [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source 1, 2|Via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is anyone going to get rid of the Evo for the Epic4g? - Page 8 - Android Central Forums</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-5498</link>
		<dc:creator>Is anyone going to get rid of the Evo for the Epic4g? - Page 8 - Android Central Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 04:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-5498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Update May 27: Samsung Behold II not Getting 2.x &#8211; Legal Action Being Considered &#124; Androidhead...  Lol dont worry its coming lol... Just going to take a little time and they make nowhere near as many devices as HTC.. Their support should be better given the amount of phones they release but its not... That is all...       Last edited by youngzayiles; 08-02-2010 at 06:26 PM. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update May 27: Samsung Behold II not Getting 2.x &#8211; Legal Action Being Considered | Androidhead&#8230;  Lol dont worry its coming lol&#8230; Just going to take a little time and they make nowhere near as many devices as HTC.. Their support should be better given the amount of phones they release but its not&#8230; That is all&#8230;       Last edited by youngzayiles; 08-02-2010 at 06:26 PM. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is anyone going to get rid of the Evo for the Epic4g? - Page 8 - Android Central Forums</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-5394</link>
		<dc:creator>Is anyone going to get rid of the Evo for the Epic4g? - Page 8 - Android Central Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 22:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-5394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Update May 27: Samsung Behold II not Getting 2.x &#8211; Legal Action Being Considered &#124; Androidhead...  Lol dont worry its coming... Just going to take a little time and they make nowhere near as many devices as HTC.. Their support should be better given the amount of phones they release but its not... [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update May 27: Samsung Behold II not Getting 2.x &#8211; Legal Action Being Considered | Androidhead&#8230;  Lol dont worry its coming&#8230; Just going to take a little time and they make nowhere near as many devices as HTC.. Their support should be better given the amount of phones they release but its not&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung Betrug</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-2988</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung Betrug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 09:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-2988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Suit for 2.0) Am 27 Mai is t die Blase geplatzt und Samsung sagt jetzt es wird nie 2.0 geben (Update May 27: Samsung Behold II not Getting 2.x &#8211; Legal Action Being Considered &#124; Androidhead...). Ich meine dass ist  &#066;&#101;&#116;&#114;&#117;&#103; - Samsung regiert gar nicht auf email [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Suit for 2.0) Am 27 Mai is t die Blase geplatzt und Samsung sagt jetzt es wird nie 2.0 geben (Update May 27: Samsung Behold II not Getting 2.x &#8211; Legal Action Being Considered | Androidhead&#8230;). Ich meine dass ist  &#66;&#101;&#116;&#114;&#117;&#103; &#8211; Samsung regiert gar nicht auf email [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Things iPhone Does Better Than Android - TiPb iPhone, iPad, iPod Forums</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-2092</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Things iPhone Does Better Than Android - TiPb iPhone, iPad, iPod Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 19:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-2092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the hardware, and even when they do promise an update, sometimes they decide not to deliver (see Samsung and the Behold II). There is no guarantee your phone will ever get an official update.   Some people will say the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the hardware, and even when they do promise an update, sometimes they decide not to deliver (see Samsung and the Behold II). There is no guarantee your phone will ever get an official update.   Some people will say the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google to update Android OS once a year &#124; Tech Alps</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-1941</link>
		<dc:creator>Google to update Android OS once a year &#124; Tech Alps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 01:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-1941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] products instead of you waiting and wondering if your device will ever receive one, hence the Samsung Behold II debacle. It will make life a lot easier for development of newer applications.  With one year before the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] products instead of you waiting and wondering if your device will ever receive one, hence the Samsung Behold II debacle. It will make life a lot easier for development of newer applications.  With one year before the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung Not Responding to Users Questions? &#124; Quick Tech News</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-1924</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung Not Responding to Users Questions? &#124; Quick Tech News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-1924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  Samsung Not Responding to Users Questions?June 1st, 2010 by qicktechnews.comIn a story published a couple of weeks ago we saw Samsung back away from their word on an update for the Behold II to Android 2.x. There has [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Samsung Not Responding to Users Questions?June 1st, 2010 by qicktechnews.comIn a story published a couple of weeks ago we saw Samsung back away from their word on an update for the Behold II to Android 2.x. There has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung Behold II won’t get Android 2.x update, users planning to sue &#171; [TEST] Korea.com</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-1920</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung Behold II won’t get Android 2.x update, users planning to sue &#171; [TEST] Korea.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-1920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Source 1, 2&#124;Via [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source 1, 2|Via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung Behold II won’t get Android 2.x update, users planning to sue &#171; Korea.com &#62; Tech</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-1903</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung Behold II won’t get Android 2.x update, users planning to sue &#171; Korea.com &#62; Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 23:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-1903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Source 1, 2&#124;Via [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source 1, 2|Via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Upcoming stuff, the blog lives on(video) &#124; The Anphase Blog</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-1865</link>
		<dc:creator>Upcoming stuff, the blog lives on(video) &#124; The Anphase Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 08:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-1865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] pan out as usual. The disgruntled Behold II owners started a petition and they are even threatening legal action. That sounds awfully familiar. Maybe they&#8217;ll write a report next, who [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pan out as usual. The disgruntled Behold II owners started a petition and they are even threatening legal action. That sounds awfully familiar. Maybe they&#8217;ll write a report next, who [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-1864</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 03:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-1864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google stated that Froyo was built with slower processors in mind. Maybe the folks at this post can help some of you Behold users get 2.2 on your phones. 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://phandroid.com/2010/05/21/froyo-technically-possible-on-the-g1-still-not-likely-to-receive-official-update/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://phandroid.com/2010/05/21/froyo-technically...&lt;/a&gt;  
 
Good luck. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google stated that Froyo was built with slower processors in mind. Maybe the folks at this post can help some of you Behold users get 2.2 on your phones.</p>
<p>  <a href="http://phandroid.com/2010/05/21/froyo-technically-possible-on-the-g1-still-not-likely-to-receive-official-update/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://phandroid.com/2010/05/21/froyo-technically" rel="nofollow">http://phandroid.com/2010/05/21/froyo-technically</a>&#8230;  </p>
<p>Good luck. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Behold 2 is a waste of time. - Page 2 - Android Forums</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-1856</link>
		<dc:creator>Behold 2 is a waste of time. - Page 2 - Android Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 01:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-1856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mobile Tweaks &#124; Samsung Behold II owners consider legal action over lack of Android 2.x upgrade</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-1845</link>
		<dc:creator>Mobile Tweaks &#124; Samsung Behold II owners consider legal action over lack of Android 2.x upgrade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 21:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-1845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] II owners are understandably upset and some are considering legal action if something is not done. Customers are also demanding an upgrade on the official T-Mobile forums [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] II owners are understandably upset and some are considering legal action if something is not done. Customers are also demanding an upgrade on the official T-Mobile forums [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung Behold II owners consider legal action over lack of Android 2.x upgrade &#124; Cellular Site</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-1832</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung Behold II owners consider legal action over lack of Android 2.x upgrade &#124; Cellular Site</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 15:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-1832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] II owners are understandably upset and some are considering legal action if something is not done. Customers are also demanding an upgrade on the official T-Mobile forums [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] II owners are understandably upset and some are considering legal action if something is not done. Customers are also demanding an upgrade on the official T-Mobile forums [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayyyyyyyy</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-1826</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayyyyyyyy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-1826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My husband and I both bought the behold 2. Contact and $500 Christmas bonus cash down the drain. If Samsung doesn&#039;t change their mind and get away with not giving us the update they mention in the promo video. Moving to Verizon and getting a droid is definitely looking like its on top of the the todo list. Seriously is a monkey that pisses in its mouth running Samsung? And shame on Tmobile for not backing up their behold 2 buyers. WTF is wrong with them? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My husband and I both bought the behold 2. Contact and $500 Christmas bonus cash down the drain. If Samsung doesn&#039;t change their mind and get away with not giving us the update they mention in the promo video. Moving to Verizon and getting a droid is definitely looking like its on top of the the todo list. Seriously is a monkey that pisses in its mouth running Samsung? And shame on Tmobile for not backing up their behold 2 buyers. WTF is wrong with them? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: About that whole Samsung Behold II/Android upgrade drama&#8230; &#171; Gadgetsteria</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-1821</link>
		<dc:creator>About that whole Samsung Behold II/Android upgrade drama&#8230; &#171; Gadgetsteria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 10:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-1821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] AndroidHeadlines    Categories: Operating Systems, Smartphones, Tech Disappointments Tags: android 1.6, android 2.x, behold II, cupcake, eclair, lawsuit, lie, Samsung, shady, upgrade [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AndroidHeadlines    Categories: Operating Systems, Smartphones, Tech Disappointments Tags: android 1.6, android 2.x, behold II, cupcake, eclair, lawsuit, lie, Samsung, shady, upgrade [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung Behold II won’t get Android 2.x update, users planning to sue &#124; Samsung Hub</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-1812</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung Behold II won’t get Android 2.x update, users planning to sue &#124; Samsung Hub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 07:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-1812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Source 1, 2&#124;Via [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source 1, 2|Via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-1810</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 06:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-1810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello Behold II Owners 
 
I am the editor at Androidheadlines.com,i just wanted to stop by and show my support for you all.I understand your situation and have lived it as well. Just because Samsung says 1.6 and that&#039;s it, you do need to keep applying pressure.You are their customers and the threat of unhappy customers is not something t-mobile wants and with enough pressure they will have to right this wrong. 
 
My own personal experience came from almost the exactly same situation.I owned a Rogers HTC dream that was and still stuck at 1.5 OS.Customers became unhappy and applied pressure to Rogers and HTC.They said they would not update it and we continued with the pressure till finally Rogers understood how many unhappy customers it had and offered a limited time upgrade to the HTC Magic.Story does not end their, the HTC magic had only 1.5 as well and we kept the fight up and finally got Rogers and HTC to agree to upgrade the Magic to 2.1 OS.We have not received that 2.1 update as of yet but we plan to keep them to their word. 
 
In my mind this is more about principal then the update.If companies think they can get away with this behavior now then this will become the norm. 
 
I am willing to stand behind the owners of the Samsung Behold II and give them our sites full resources to keep applying pressure to Samsung and T-Mobile till a satisfactory resolution for Behold II owners is made.I wish you all the best of luck and to keep up the fight,you will win in the end!! 
 
Chris Y 
Editor 
androidheadlines.com ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Behold II Owners</p>
<p>I am the editor at Androidheadlines.com,i just wanted to stop by and show my support for you all.I understand your situation and have lived it as well. Just because Samsung says 1.6 and that&#039;s it, you do need to keep applying pressure.You are their customers and the threat of unhappy customers is not something t-mobile wants and with enough pressure they will have to right this wrong.</p>
<p>My own personal experience came from almost the exactly same situation.I owned a Rogers HTC dream that was and still stuck at 1.5 OS.Customers became unhappy and applied pressure to Rogers and HTC.They said they would not update it and we continued with the pressure till finally Rogers understood how many unhappy customers it had and offered a limited time upgrade to the HTC Magic.Story does not end their, the HTC magic had only 1.5 as well and we kept the fight up and finally got Rogers and HTC to agree to upgrade the Magic to 2.1 OS.We have not received that 2.1 update as of yet but we plan to keep them to their word.</p>
<p>In my mind this is more about principal then the update.If companies think they can get away with this behavior now then this will become the norm.</p>
<p>I am willing to stand behind the owners of the Samsung Behold II and give them our sites full resources to keep applying pressure to Samsung and T-Mobile till a satisfactory resolution for Behold II owners is made.I wish you all the best of luck and to keep up the fight,you will win in the end!!</p>
<p>Chris Y</p>
<p>Editor</p>
<p>androidheadlines.com </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung Drops Behold II from Android 2.0 to 1.6, Lawsuit Still Planned &#124; PhoneNews.com</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-1809</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung Drops Behold II from Android 2.0 to 1.6, Lawsuit Still Planned &#124; PhoneNews.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 04:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-1809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] today a protest started with petitions and promises of forming a lawsuit if Samsung does not make good on its [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] today a protest started with petitions and promises of forming a lawsuit if Samsung does not make good on its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung Behold II fails to fulfill Android 2.0 promise, jilted users contemplating lawsuit (video) &#124; ThaiDC.com</title>
		<link>http://androidheadlines.com/2010/05/samsung-behold-ii-not-getting-2-x-legal-action-being-considered.html#comment-1803</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung Behold II fails to fulfill Android 2.0 promise, jilted users contemplating lawsuit (video) &#124; ThaiDC.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 03:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidheadlines.com/?p=13052#comment-1803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#160;&#124;&#160; Android Headlines &#160;&#124;&#160;Email this&#160;&#124;&#160;Comments  ที่มา :: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &nbsp;|&nbsp; Android Headlines &nbsp;|&nbsp;Email this&nbsp;|&nbsp;Comments  ที่มา :: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
